Diadia
Our TechnologyResourcesAboutLoginBook a call

© 2026 Diadia. All rights reserved.

About UsOur TechnologyResearchResources
Privacy Policy
SupportBook a callLogin
Health Privacy Policy
InstagramFacebookLinkedInX (formerly Twitter)
Terms and Conditions
About UsOur TechnologyResearchResources
Privacy Policy
SupportBook a callLogin
Health Privacy Policy
InstagramFacebookLinkedInX (formerly Twitter)
Terms and Conditions

© 2026 Diadia. All rights reserved.

←Transparency Reports

metabolic · Mechanism Report

Does the LDLR rs688 variant raise LDL cholesterol by altering receptor splicing?

The rs688 T allele reduces LDLR exon 12 splicing efficiency, lowering functional receptor levels and leading to higher plasma LDL cholesterol.

SupportedJune 19, 20269 Sources

Reasoning Paths

Each route from condition to outcome carries a support score — the product of its edge weights. Select one to isolate it on the figure.

This is what AI claimed

The LDLR rs688 variant is associated with altered LDL receptor splicing or function and can be associated with higher LDL cholesterol due to reduced LDL particle clearance.

laying out figure…
All 3 paths supported
UnsupportedPlausibleSupported

How to read the figure

Evidence state

  • ●EstablishedStrong, replicated evidence.
  • ◐ModerateEvidence-informed; limited or moderate.
  • ◇PlausibleMechanistically coherent, not established.
  • ✕UnsupportedTested and not supported — link breaks.
  • ?MissingNo evidence either way — untested.

Node shapes

  • BiomarkerA measurable state — a lab value, hormone, or genetic factor.
  • ProcessA biological process, pathway, or mechanism step.
  • ConditionA condition, exposure, intervention, or symptom.
  • OutcomeThe endpoint the claim leads to.

Executive summary

The claim states that the rs688 (c.1706C>T) variant disrupts an exonic splicing enhancer, increasing exon 12 skipping and producing fewer stable LDLR transcripts. This loss of functional receptor impairs hepatic clearance of LDL particles, resulting in elevated circulating LDL-C and associated increased cardiovascular risk.

Verified conclusion

The LDLR rs688 variant is a well-characterized genetic polymorphism that directly impacts cholesterol metabolism by altering the splicing efficiency of the Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor (LDLR) gene. This variant, located in exon 12, serves as a critical model for how synonymous mutations—which do not change the amino acid sequence—can still significantly influence disease risk by disrupting regulatory mechanisms.

Mechanistic evidence

The rs688 variant (c.1706C>T) functions by disrupting an exonic splicing enhancer (ESE) sequence.

  • Alternative Splicing: Molecular studies, including minigene assays and analysis of human liver tissue, demonstrate that the presence of the "T" allele leads to increased skipping of exon 12 during pre-mRNA processing.
  • Protein Expression: This splicing error results in truncated or unstable mRNA transcripts, which reduces the total amount of functional LDLR protein reaching the cell surface by approximately 10% to 20%.
  • Receptor Function: Because exon 12 is part of the β-propeller domain essential for ligand binding and pH-dependent receptor recycling, its absence or alteration impairs the receptor's ability to bind, internalize, and clear LDL particles from the bloodstream.

Clinical and effectiveness evidence

The reduction in functional receptors translates into measurable differences in lipid profiles across diverse populations.

  • LDL Elevation: Large-scale association studies, including the Framingham Heart Study and various meta-analyses, consistently link the rs688 "T" allele with significantly higher total and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels.
  • Dose-Response Effect: Evidence suggests a dose-response relationship, where individuals carrying two copies of the "T" allele (homozygotes) exhibit the highest LDL-C concentrations compared to those with the "CC" genotype.
  • Cardiovascular Risk: Due to the sustained elevation of circulating LDL particles, carriers of the variant allele face a heightened risk for coronary artery disease (CAD), with some studies reporting increased odds ratios for cardiovascular events in both male and female cohorts.

Bottom line

The LDLR rs688 variant is a confirmed genetic factor that reduces the efficiency of LDL receptor splicing. This molecular defect leads to fewer functional receptors on the liver surface, reduced clearance of LDL particles, and a subsequent increase in plasma LDL cholesterol, contributing to an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease.

References

  1. A common polymorphism decreases low-density lipoprotein receptor exon 12 splicing efficiency and associates with increased cholesterol. — pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
  2. A common polymorphism decreases low-density lipoprotein receptor exon 12 splicing efficiency and associates with increased cholesterol. — academic.oup.com ↗
  3. Role of SFRS13A in low‐density lipoprotein receptor splicing — onlinelibrary.wiley.com ↗
  4. A common polymorphism in the LDL receptor gene has multiple effects on LDL receptor function. — academic.oup.com ↗
  5. A common polymorphism in the LDL receptor gene has multiple effects on LDL receptor function. — pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
  6. LDLR rs688 TT Genotype and T Allele Are Associated with Increased Susceptibility to Coronary Artery Disease—A Case-Control Study — mdpi.com ↗
  7. LDLR rs688 TT Genotype and T Allele Are Associated with Increased Susceptibility to Coronary Artery Disease—A Case-Control Study — pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
  8. Mutual Effect of rs688 and rs5925 in Regulating Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor Splicing — journals.sagepub.com ↗
  9. Sex-dependent association of a common low-density lipoprotein receptor polymorphism with RNA splicing efficiency in the brain and Alzheimer's disease. — pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗

See a full patient report verified like this

Book a walkthrough

Related Claims

Plausible8 sourcesDoes the MTHFR rs1801131 A1298C variant mildly reduce enzyme activity and have a smaller homocysteine effect than C677T?→Plausible3 sourcesIs TMAO formed from gut microbial conversion of choline and carnitine followed by liver oxidation?→