Diadia
Our TechnologyResearchResourcesAboutLoginBook a call

© 2026 Diadia. All rights reserved.

About UsOur TechnologyResearchResourcesResearch
Privacy Policy
SupportBook a callLogin
Health Privacy Policy
InstagramFacebookLinkedInX (formerly Twitter)
Terms and Conditions
About UsOur TechnologyResearchResourcesResearch
Privacy Policy
SupportBook a callLogin
Health Privacy Policy
InstagramFacebookLinkedInX (formerly Twitter)
Terms and Conditions

© 2026 Diadia. All rights reserved.

←Transparency Reports

immunity · Mechanism Report

Does Amphiphysin IgG indicate paraneoplastic neurologic autoimmunity?

Amphiphysin IgG is a high-risk paraneoplastic marker, but its meaning depends on the neurologic phenotype and cancer context rather than antibody positivity alone.

PlausibleOctober 1, 20268 Sources

Reasoning Paths

Each route from condition to outcome carries a support score — the product of its edge weights. Select one to isolate it on the figure.

This is what AI claimed

Amphiphysin IgG is an onconeural antibody associated with paraneoplastic neurologic autoimmunity, but antibody positivity alone does not establish active cancer and must be interpreted with cancer status and neurologic phenotype.

laying out figure…
2 of 7 paths supported
UnsupportedPlausibleSupported

How to read the figure

Evidence state

  • ●EstablishedStrong, replicated evidence.
  • ◐ModerateEvidence-informed; limited or moderate.
  • ◇PlausibleMechanistically coherent, not established.
  • ✕UnsupportedTested and not supported — link breaks.
  • ?MissingNo evidence either way — untested.

Node shapes

  • BiomarkerA measurable state — a lab value, hormone, or genetic factor.
  • ProcessA biological process, pathway, or mechanism step.
  • ConditionA condition, exposure, intervention, or symptom.
  • OutcomeThe endpoint the claim leads to.

Executive summary

The claim says amphiphysin IgG is linked to paraneoplastic neurologic autoimmunity and to cancers such as breast cancer and small-cell lung cancer. The mechanism framing emphasizes that this is a context-dependent marker: compatible neurologic syndromes and validated confirmatory testing are needed before attributing the result to paraneoplastic disease or active cancer.

Verified conclusion

Amphiphysin IgG is a clinically important onconeural marker, but its meaning is probabilistic and context-dependent—not a stand-alone diagnosis of either cancer or paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome (PNS).

Clinical significance

  • Amphiphysin is a high-risk PNS antibody in the 2021 PNS-Care framework, a category associated with cancer in >70% of relevant PNS contexts.
  • Compatible neurologic phenotypes include stiff-person spectrum disorder, encephalomyelitis/myelopathy, limbic encephalitis, sensory neuronopathy, and other neuropathies.
  • Principal tumor associations are breast cancer and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The phenotype and coexisting antibodies can refine this inference—for example, stiff-person syndrome with isolated amphiphysin IgG has a classic breast-cancer association, while ANNA-1/Hu co-positivity favors SCLC.

Interpretation, testing, and cancer assessment

  • A positive result does not establish active, recurrent, or occult cancer. PNS-Care diagnostic certainty integrates the neurologic syndrome, antibody risk category, tumor evidence, and follow-up; a compatible cancer is generally needed for definite PNS classification.
  • Isolated commercial line-blot positivity can be clinically irrelevant or false-positive, particularly with an atypical syndrome or absent CSF corroboration. Confirmation with tissue-based immunofluorescence/immunohistochemistry plus antigen-specific immunoblot, ideally assessing serum and CSF, is important.
  • With a confirmed result and compatible syndrome, screening should target thoracic malignancy (CT; FDG-PET/PET-CT if suspicion persists) and breast cancer where appropriate. If initial testing is negative but both antibody and phenotype are high risk, repeat screening every 4–6 months for 2 years is supported.

Mechanistic context

  • Amphiphysin is an intracellular synaptic protein; IgG more likely marks tumor-driven antigen-specific cellular autoimmunity than proves direct antibody-mediated neuronal injury.

Bottom line

  • Amphiphysin IgG warrants validated testing and focused malignancy evaluation, but only concordance among antibody, neurologic phenotype, and cancer evidence supports a paraneoplastic attribution.

References

  1. Updated Diagnostic Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes | Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation — neurology.org ↗
  2. Paraneoplastic and Other Autoimmune Disorders of the Central ... — pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
  3. Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes: clinical presentations ... — pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
  4. Updated Diagnostic Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic ... — pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
  5. Diagnosis and Treatment of Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes — pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
  6. Updated Diagnostic Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes — pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
  7. Serum Tumor Markers in Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes: A Systematic Review of Guidelines — frontiersin.org ↗
  8. [PDF] Updated Diagnostic Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes — air.uniud.it ↗

See a full patient report verified like this

Book a walkthrough

Related Claims

Plausible14 sourcesCan suboptimal vitamin D reduce immune regulation?→Plausible8 sourcesIs food allergy an immune reaction distinct from the TMAO pathway?→