Diadia
Our TechnologyResearchResourcesAboutLoginBook a call

© 2026 Diadia. All rights reserved.

About UsOur TechnologyResearchResourcesResearch
Privacy Policy
SupportBook a callLogin
Health Privacy Policy
InstagramFacebookLinkedInX (formerly Twitter)
Terms and Conditions
About UsOur TechnologyResearchResourcesResearch
Privacy Policy
SupportBook a callLogin
Health Privacy Policy
InstagramFacebookLinkedInX (formerly Twitter)
Terms and Conditions

© 2026 Diadia. All rights reserved.

←Transparency Reports

immunity · Mechanism Report

Do amphiphysin, CV2/CRMP5, and Yo antibodies need cancer-context interpretation?

These high-risk onconeural antibodies can point to tumor-associated autoimmunity, but antibody positivity alone does not diagnose active malignancy or a paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome.

PlausibleOctober 1, 202612 Sources

Reasoning Paths

Each route from condition to outcome carries a support score — the product of its edge weights. Select one to isolate it on the figure.

This is what AI claimed

Amphiphysin, CV2/CRMP5, and Yo are recognized onconeural antibodies that warrant interpretation in cancer context, but antibody positivity alone does not establish active malignancy or a paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome.

laying out figure…
9 of 12 paths supported
UnsupportedPlausibleSupported

How to read the figure

Evidence state

  • ●EstablishedStrong, replicated evidence.
  • ◐ModerateEvidence-informed; limited or moderate.
  • ◇PlausibleMechanistically coherent, not established.
  • ✕UnsupportedTested and not supported — link breaks.
  • ?MissingNo evidence either way — untested.

Node shapes

  • BiomarkerA measurable state — a lab value, hormone, or genetic factor.
  • ProcessA biological process, pathway, or mechanism step.
  • ConditionA condition, exposure, intervention, or symptom.
  • OutcomeThe endpoint the claim leads to.

Executive summary

The claim says amphiphysin, CV2/CRMP5, and Yo are important cancer-associated antibodies that should prompt interpretation in the right clinical context. The mechanism framing emphasizes that they are markers of a tumor-linked immune response and are most meaningful when paired with compatible neurologic findings and validated testing. It also makes clear that isolated positivity can be misleading and should not be treated as proof of active cancer or paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome.

Verified conclusion

High-risk onconeural antibodies can be clinically important signals of tumor-associated autoimmunity, but their value depends on both assay validity and the neurologic/cancer context. For a 77-year-old man, CV2/CRMP5 in particular may focus attention on small-cell lung cancer or thymoma; antibody-specific associations should guide—not replace—evaluation.

Cancer-context interpretation

  • Amphiphysin, CV2/CRMP5, and Yo/PCA-1 are classified as high-risk antibodies in the 2021 PNS-Care framework, each associated with cancer in >70% of relevant cases.
  • Typical associations are amphiphysin with small-cell lung or breast cancer; CV2/CRMP5 with small-cell lung cancer or thymoma; and Yo with breast or gynecologic, particularly ovarian, cancer.
  • These intracellular-antigen antibodies primarily mark a tumor-linked, T-cell-mediated immune response rather than proving direct antibody-mediated injury.

Why a positive result is not diagnostic

  • A positive antibody result does not establish either active cancer or paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome (PNS). PNS-Care requires a compatible neurologic syndrome, cancer assessment, antibody risk category, follow-up, and exclusion of plausible alternatives.
  • Commercial line blots can yield clinically discordant positives, particularly for Yo and CV2/CRMP5. In one cohort, PNS was present in 8% with line-blot-only antibodies versus 91% with concordant line blot plus rat-brain immunohistochemistry; 12/13 isolated Yo-positive results lacked PNS.
  • In another cohort, only 31% of discordant serum-only positives were clinically relevant. Yo immunoblot positive predictive value was 28.8% alone, improving to 77.8% after immunofluorescence confirmation.

Clinical implications

  • Unexpected, low-titer, serum-only, or phenotype-discordant results warrant confirmation with complementary tissue-based immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence and antigen-specific testing, ideally in a reference laboratory.
  • If a high-risk phenotype and confirmed high-risk antibody are present but initial tumor screening is negative, repeat screening every 4–6 months for 2 years is recommended.

Bottom line

  • These antibodies justify prompt, targeted cancer and neurologic evaluation, but neither antibody positivity nor a screening-assay result alone diagnoses active malignancy or PNS.

References

  1. Updated Diagnostic Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes — pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
  2. Indications and Diagnostic Yield of Paraneoplastic and ... - PMC — pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗
  3. Updated Diagnostic Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes | Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation — neurology.org ↗
  4. An Opinion on the Clinical Laboratory Testing following the New 2021 PNS-Care Diagnostic Criteria — academic.oup.com ↗
  5. The Positive Predictive Value of Onconeural Antibody Testing — cambridge.org ↗
  6. Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes: a practical approach to diagnosis and management — pn.bmj.com ↗
  7. Clinical Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Value of Neural ... — academic.oup.com ↗
  8. Frontiers | The Diagnostic Value of Onconeural Antibodies Depends on How They Are Tested — frontiersin.org ↗
  9. Diagnostic yield of commercial immunodots to diagnose paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes | Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation — neurology.org ↗
  10. [PDF] Updated Diagnostic Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes — hal.sorbonne-universite.fr ↗
  11. Autoimmune Encephalitis and Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes | Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation — neurology.org ↗
  12. Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes: clinical presentations ... — pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗

See a full patient report verified like this

Book a walkthrough

Related Claims

Plausible14 sourcesCan suboptimal vitamin D reduce immune regulation?→Plausible8 sourcesIs food allergy an immune reaction distinct from the TMAO pathway?→